The recent news

Events : JoRC

Sept. 15, 2020

Events

This colloquium co-organized between Laboratoire DANTE and the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) inaugurates the 2021 series of colloquia devoted to the general theme of Compliance Monumental Goals. This first work will then be part of two books, Les buts monumentaux de la Compliance et Compliance Monumental Goals, which will be published in the Regulations & Compliance Series, co-edited by the JoRC and Dalloz.

 

Presentation of the colloquium Thematic: To understand the notion of "Monumental Goals", it is firstly necessary to take crossed perspectives on them, particularly through the prism of Labor Law, Environmental Law and Enterprise Law. Many questions appear. Does the notion of “Monumental Goals” present any substance in Law? Is it uniformly understood, or do specificities appear, forged by specific cultures and disciplinary practices? What are the sources and implicit references or echoes? Because even if we admit the part of novelty, there is undoubtedly an anchoring in traditional legal concepts, like the general interest or sovereignty. How does the shift from meta-legal (prima facie introduced by the concept) to legal take place, and where do any operational difficulties lie when legal actors are called upon to act? The question of a possible categorization of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored, through these three legal disciplines whose historicity, goals and implications for firms differ.  

These reflections allow to ask why and how these "Monumental Goals" are developed. Indeed, what is the relevance of the association of "Monumental Goals" and Compliance? Beyond theoretical considerations relating to the meaning of Law, is this really an effective alloy encouraging companies to behave differently? By what ways? These questions arise in particular with regard to the imperatives of legal certainty and the operative nature of the concept. The question of "Monumental Goals" will thus be explored by the operational actors of compliance, both those who act within companies and those who act from the lato sensu State sphere, for understanding whether this notion is a pure rhetoric figure or constitutes a particularly promising lever for the evolution of market behavior.

Notably with : 

  • Christophe André, maître de conférences à l'Université Paris - Saclay (lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University)
  • Regis Bismuthprofesseur de droit à Sciences po, Paris (law professor at Sciences po Paris)
  • Marie-Emma Boursierdoyen  de l'Université Paris - Saclay (dean of the Paris-Saclay University)
  • Muriel Chagny, professeur l'Université Paris - Saclay, directrice du Laboratoire Dante (Professor at the Paris-Saclay University, director of the Laboratory Dante)
  • Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professeur à Sciences po (Paris) (Professor at Sciences Po Paris)
  • Isabelle Gavanon, avocate à la Cour d'Appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
  • Emma Guernaoui, doctorante
  • Dominique Heintz, avocat à la Cour d' appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal)
  • Dominique de La Garanderieavocat à la Cour d'appel de Paris (attorney before the Paris Court of Appeal) 
  • Anne-Valérie Le Fur, professeur à l'Université Paris - Saclay (Professor at Paris-Saclay University)
  • Marie Malaurie, professeur à l'Université Paris-Saclay (professor at the Paris-Saclay University)
  • Benoît Petitmaître de conférences (HDR) à l'Université Paris-Saclay, vice-président à l'Université Paris - Saclay (lecturer at the Paris-Saclay University) 
  • Jean-François Vaquieri, Secrétaire Général d'Enedis (Secretary General of Enedis)

____

 

 

Aug. 31, 2020

Events : JoRC

 

.

The notion of "monumental goals" was proposed in 2016!footnote-139. It is central in the compliance mechanisms in that they can only claim to constrain and cost those in which they are inserted in that they tend to achieve goals whose substantial quality is to be "monumental" . This notion is not self-evident, having to be justified, detailed, put into perspective and concretely illustrated, a series of conferences organized by numerous universities is therefore devoted to it.  

Like the previous cycles devoted to the general theme of Compliance and aiming to build a "Compliance Law", intended like them to be published in the Regulations & Compliance collection, this cycle addresses a particular aspect of this branch of Law in progress. to develop, which was applied even before it was conceived. The Compliance mechanisms having preceded the conceptualization of this way of doing things, the "Compliance Tools" having been the subject of the previous cycle of conferences, this new cycle addresses what characterizes Compliance : Les  buts monumentaux de la Compliance (Monumental Goals of Compliance) .

As the book Compliance Tools is written in English, the future book will be also available in English, even if conferences will have been in French. .

This cycle of scientific manifestation will take place in parallel with the cycle of conferences on the theme of  La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance (Juridictionalisation of Compliance)

____

 

The notion of "monumental goals" was proposed in 2016!footnote-138. It is central in the compliance mechanisms in that they can only constrain and cost those in which they are inserted in that they tend to achieve goals whose substantial quality is to be "monumental". This notion is not self-evident, having to be justified, detailed, put into perspective and concretely illustrated, a series of conferences organized by numerous universities is therefore devoted to it.

These various conferences will be held in several places, according to the part taken by the various university structures which bring their support to the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) for the realization of the cycle. This will result in two collective books, one in French: Les buts monumental de la Compliance, the other in English: Monumental Goals of Compliance.

This cycle of scientific manifestations on Les buts monumentaux de la Compliance will start on October 2020 and goes until Novembre 2021.

 

  • First scientific Manifestation: 22 October 2020, La considération par les Autorités Publiques de la conjoncture économique dans l'expression et la poursuite  par le Droit de la Compliance de buts monumentaux, under the Scientific Direction of Guillaume Sarrat de Tramezaigues, Sciences Po, Paris.

 

  • Second scientific Manifestation : 22 January 2021, Radioscopie d'une notion : les "buts monumentaux" de la Compliance, under the Scientifique Direction of Benoît Petit andChristophe André, Université Versailles - Saint-Quentin

 

 

The Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) benefits from the partnership of : 

 

 

The cycle is supported by :

 

 

 

Aug. 31, 2020

Events : JoRC

Like the previous cycles devoted to the general theme of Compliance and aiming to build a "Compliance Law", intended like them to be published in the Regulations & Compliance collection, this cycle addresses a particular aspect of this branch of Law in progress. to develop. "Compliance tools" having been the subject of the previous cycle of conferences and showing judges, lawyers, jurisdictions, this new cycle addresses a new phenomenon in Compliance: La juridictionnalisation de la Compliance (The juridictionalization of Compliance).

It will take place in parallel with the series of conferences on the theme: Les buts monumental de la Compliance (The monumental goals of Compliance).

There have always been judges and lawyers in Compliance Law, in particular because this is the extension of Regulatory Law in which they have a full place. This results from the fact that the decisions taken in respect of Compliance are contestable in court, those issued by the company, such as those of States or Authorities. The novelty lies more in the phenomenon of "legalization", that is to say that the jurisdictional model penetrates all Compliance Law, and not only the Ex Post part that this includes. Furthermore, it seems that this jurisdictionalization influences the non-legal dimension of Compliance. This movement has effects that must be measured and causes that must be understood. Advantages and disadvantages that must be balanced. If only to form an opinion on this "juridictionalization of Compliance".

  • First conference : 

 

 

 

The Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) benefits from the partnership of : 

 

 

The cycle is supported by :

June 18, 2020

Events : JoRC

June 18, 2020

Events : JoRC

June 18, 2020

Events : JoRC

June 18, 2020

Breaking news