Search results (1699 cards)

Advanced search

► Full Reference: Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Conseil national des Barreaux (CNB), Compliance, vigilance et médiation (Compliance, Vigilance and Mediation), November 30, 2023, Amphithéâtre du Conseil national des barreaux.

____

____

► The symposium is organised by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and the Conseil national des barreaux (CNB). 

This symposium is held in French.

The symposium is placed under the scientific direction of 🕴️Matthieu Boissavy, 🕴️Hirbod Dehghani-Azar and 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche.

____

► Presentation of the theme: To increase respect for human rights and the environment in the context of corporate social responsibility and compliance, public authorities and companies have for several years been implementing instruments and processes for dialogue between companies on the one hand and stakeholders inside and outside the company on the other. Among these, mediation is regularly highlighted as a necessary and fruitful process for reaching agreements that benefit employees and civil society players, as well as the environment and society as a whole.

John Ruggie, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, in his report of 21 March 2011, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, recommends mediation as an effective and appropriate non-judicial grievance mechanism. The ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility also explicitly refers to the use of mediation in the section Actions and related expectations (6.3.2.6) and say that an organisation should establish or ensure the availability of redress mechanisms for its own use and for that of its stakeholders. For these mechanisms to be effective, they should be [...] based on dialogue and mediation: the process should aim to remedy breaches through mutually agreed solutions reached through dialogue between the parties. Where a judgment is desirable, the parties should retain the right to reach it through separate, independent mechanisms.

Similarly, the French law No. 2017-399 of 21 March 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre (on the duty of vigilance of parent companies and ordering companies) has given rise to disputes relating to the design and application of vigilance plans by certain companies subject to this law. Mediation has been proposed by the courts, sometimes accepted, and we know that some have been successful.

At the same time, the draft European Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence (CS3D) is likely to impose or extend obligations relating to the duty of vigilance on a large number of companies in the European Union, for the respect of human rights and the environment by companies in global value chains.

The result of all this is that respect for human rights within organisations and companies depends on recourse to the courts, on cooperation processes such as mediation, both project mediation and mediation specific to the resolution of disputes, while recourse to the courts will not suffice to rapidly make respect for these obligations effective.

The legislator and the parties concerned are aware of this, and they refer to the use of mediation as necessary to help both civil society actors committed to respect for human rights and the environment and companies to reach agreements on compliance with these obligations.

Lawyers, mediators and people assisting stakeholders and companies have an important role to play in the success of these mediations.

In collaboration with the Journal of Regulation and Compliance (JoRC), the Conseil national des barreaux (CNB) is organising a half-day conference on "Compliance, vigilance et médiation" ("Compliance, Vigilance and Mediation") to train lawyers to this activity, which will develop either as an extension of another activity or as its own activity, and which has major implications for individual rights, society and the environment.

____

► Construction of the symposium:  After a general introduction to the triptych of Compliance, Vigilance and Mediation and the links that it implies, the first part of the event will focus on the contribution of Mediation to the effectiveness of Compliance and, more particularly, to its most advanced aspect, the duty of vigilance. After a debate on this topic, the second part of the event will focus on the conduct of project mediation or dispute resolution in such a context. A conclusion will enable us to draw immediate lessons from the information and exchanges that have taken place.

____

Speakers:  

🎤Matthieu Boissavy, attorney at the Paris Bar, vice-president of the Commission Liberté et droits de l'homme of the CNB

🎤Matthieu Brochier, attorney at the Paris Bar

🎤Stéphanie Brunengo, attorney at the Aix-en-Provence Bat, mediator

🎤Malik Chapuis, judge in the 3rd chamber of the Tribunal judiciaire de Paris (Paris First Instance Civil Court)

🎤Bruno Deffains, professor at Paris Panthéon-Assas University

🎤Hirbod Dehghani-Azar, attorney at the Paris Bar, president of the Commission Modes alternatifs de règlements des Règlements (MARD) of the CNB

🎤Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professor of Regulatory Law and Compliance Law, director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC)

🎤Jérôme Gavaudan, president of the CNB

🎤Thibault Goujon-Bethan, professor at Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University

🎤Céline Haye Kioussis, legal director if the BPCE Group

🎤Stéphane de Navacelle, attorney at the Paris Bar

🎤Lori Roussey, Data Protection Officer, founder and Director of Data Rights

🎤Stephanie Smatt Pinelli, litigation legal director, Orano Group

____

🔻 Read a detailed presentation of the event below:

► Full reference : Journal of Regulation & Compliance(JoRC) and Jean Moulin University (Lyon 3), Contractual litigation in compliance: procedural and jurisdictional aspects, Jean Moulin University (Lyon 3), 29 May 2026.

► The colloquium is organised by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC), the Centre Patrimoine, contrats et procédure civile  -CPC2  (Centre for Estate, Contracts and Civil Procedure) and the Centre de droit de l'entreprise - CDE (Centre for Business Law) at Jean Moulin University (Lyon 3). 

 

____

🏗️This symposium is part of the 2026 series of symposiums on "Compliance & Contracts" organised by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and its partner universities.

____

The symposium is under the scientific responsibility of 🕴️Marie-Anne Frison-Roche and 🕴️Thibault Goujon-Bethan.

It will be held in French.

 

To register for in-person and distance learning:.....

🧮The event will take place at the Palais de l'Université, 15 quai Claude Bernard, 69007, Lyon, in the Paul Roubier lecture amphitheatre.

_____

► Presentation of the topic :  Two movements intersect: firstly, what is commonly referred to as the "contractualisation of justice", an image that nevertheless refers to the inclusion of truly contractual techniques in procedural proceedings, and secondly, through the Compliance Juridictionalisation, the emergence of Systemic Litigation, which by transitivity bears the hallmarks of Compliance Law itself.

Furthermore, compliance techniques are increasingly giving way to contractual mechanisms, either through "compliance contracts" or through "compliance clauses". This therefore gives rise to contractual disputes. These are also influenced by Compliance Law, notably its norative Monumental Goals, albeit indirectly rather than directly.

Thus, in various new ways, a new field of "contractual litigation involving compliance" is emerging. This field involves procedural and jurisdictional aspects, which will be examined during this event.

Firstly, it is necessary to define this contractual dispute involving compliance (I), which has only recently emerged, because although we have always been familiar with contractual disputes on the one hand, dispute over regulation and compliance in the second instance, their entanglement with the contractualisation of justice is new. This may even come as a shock, in that Compliance Law, because it is not at all simply an obligation to obey applicable regulations, carries with it systemic ambitions for the future and thus finds itself, through contracts, brought before judges who are more accustomed to disputes between two individual parties.

This opens up the topics of judges hearing cases and judges of nature (II), the parties to the dispute and the parties to the proceedings (III), procedural treatment (IV), judgement and its enforcement (V).

____

Speakers will include :  

🎤Anaïs Danet, Professor at the University of Reims

🎤 Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, Professor of Regulatory Law and Compliance, Director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC)

🎤Thibault Goujon-Bethan, Professor at Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University, Director of the Centre Patrimoine, contrats et procédure civile  -CPC2  (Centre for Estate, Contracts and Civil Procedure)

🎤Nicolas Ida, Professor at the University of Haute-Alsace

🎤Alex Nicollet, Barrister at the Paris Bar, PhD student at Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University

🎤Cyril Nourissat, Professor at Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University

🎤Romain Raine, Senior Lecturer at Jean Moulin Lyon 3 University

🎤Fabrice Vert, First Vice-President of the Paris First Instance Court of Justice

🎤Liza Veyre, Professor at the University of Paris 8

____

The proceedings of this symposium will form the basis of a specific chapter in the following publications:

📕Compliance et Contrat, to be published in French in the collection 📚Regulations & Compliance, co-published by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Lefebvre-Dalloz.

📘Compliance and Contract, to be published in English in the 📚Compliance & Regulation  Serie, co-published by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant (Larcier-Intersentia).

 

🔻 Read the schedule for the event below ⤵️

Complete reference : GABAIX Xavier, LANDIER Augustin, THESMAR David, La protection du consommateur : rationalité limitée et régulation. Observations by MONGIN Philippe and TIROLE Jean. 2012, 92 pages. Edited by the "Conseil d'analyse économique" Publisher :

Germany is characterized in that in Europe generally has refused liberalization of the gambling industry. For this, it will incur remonstrance’s from the European Commission. But this issue is the responsibility of the Länder. That is why, when the Land of Schleswig-Holsteing decided in April 2011 to open the sector to competition online games, Everyone saw a sign of liberalism and compliance with European lines. But the government of this land has changed in May 2012 to make way for a coalition, it seems more favorable to a closure of that activity or, at lesse, should be left to public monopolies. However, on September 2, 5 licenses are to be given by that Government to the major operators of online games, which shows that the line previously adopted market-opening games online is maintained, unlike the rest of the Germany.

Libor is the rate set by the bank statements, anticipating purchases liquidity between them. The Libor rate is the result of self-regulation. On this rate, the financial system leans to fix rates many different financial transactions. However, now many banks are sued by authorities, for manipulation. The banks made false statement or organize a cartel, producing a rate in their favor. From the condemnation of the Barclays 26 June 2012 by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the commencement of proceedings, the constitution of the Commission to think reform Libor estimated pernicious, banks choose their strategy. Most prefer to cooperate fully in themselves investigation leading home and helping the authorities. This was the case of the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS). Today it is the case of Société Générale (SocGen).