It translates into a set of obligations that companies must perform to ensure that harmful behavior does not occur, such as bribery, money laundering, pollution, etc.
This results in "structural" obligations, such as the establishment of a risk map, a third-party vigilance system, internal controls, the adoption of codes.
The practical question that arises is whether to punish a company, it is necessary but it is sufficient that the company has not adopted these structural measures, or if it is also necessary that within it or through the persons whom it must be accountable (through the corporate officers and the employees, but also the suppliers, the sub-contractors, the financed operators, etc.) there were behaviors that Compliance Law prohibits, for example corruption, money laundering, pollution, safety-related accident, etc.
The question is probative. Its practical stake is considerable.
Because to obtain the conviction the prosecuting authority will have to demonstrate not only a failure in the structural device but also a behavioral failure.
Si l'on considère que le Droit de la Compliance est à la fois sur l'Ex Ante et sur l'Ex Post, alors l'autorité de poursuite qui requiert une sanction doit démontrer qu'il y a un comportement reprochable (Ex Post) et qu'à cela correspond une défaillance structurelle (par exemple le compte bancaire anormal n'a pas été signalé) ; si l'on considère que le Droit de la Compliance est purement en Ex Ante, alors même s'il n'y a pas de comportement reprochable en Ex Post, la seule défaillance structurelle suffit pour que l'entreprise qui doit l'organiser en son sein soit sanctionné.
If we consider that Compliance Law is both on the Ex Ante and the Ex Post, then the prosecuting authority that requires a sanction must show that there is a reprehensible behavior (Ex Post ) and that this corresponds to a structural failure (for example the abnormal bank account has not been reported); if we consider that Compliance Law is purely Ex Ante, then even if there is no reprehensible behavior in Ex Post, the only structural failure is enough for the company to be sanctioned, even if it does its best efforts, even if no prohibited behavior will have accured in Ex Post.
The second system, which is much more repressive and places a considerable burden on companies, even if there is no proven illicit behavior, is that of French Law, probably because of a tendency towards Ex Ante organization. ..
Mais il faut garder mesure. Et cette mesure est probatoire.
But we must keep measure. And this measure is probative.
This is what the Commission des Sanctions of the Agence Française Anticorruption -AFA (French Anti-Corruption Agency's Sanctions Committee) has just said, in its decision of 4 July 2019, SAS S. et Madame C.,(written in French) contradicting the position of its director, who acted as the prosecuting authority. This is yet another general proof of the autonomy of the Sanctions Committee vis-à-vis to the Administrative Authority of which it is a part, and in relation to its director, who nevertheless governs it. But, jurisdictional model obliges, he has here the status of prosecuting authority, is subject to the regime of this one and not to the regime of head of the entity. Demonstration of the "functional autonomy" of the sanctioning bodies within the administrative regulatory and compliance authorities.
Indeed, this important decision expresses with precision and reason the distribution of the "burden of the allegation" and the "burden of proof" on the prosecuting body and on the company pursued, as well as the role of presumption that the recommendations issued by the French Anti-corruption Authority can play.
The European Parliament, which according to the co decision procedure, must vote the text of directive, until the Council of European Ministers doing it, examined the draft of the Directive on Basel III standards on May 14, 2012. On prudential standards, he planned to leave the States free to adopt higher minimum requirements. In addition, it imposed that the bonus paid to the CEO didn't attain a higher price than their fixed compensation.
The case of the Libor is already designated as case which will constitute a turning point in the banking regulation. Indeed, even beyond the astronomical amounts of fines, penalties and damages that were intended to be pronounced, it’ s the declarative system, that is to say the part of self-regulation, the system which is in question. All banks are implicated. Further investigation for agreement is also open. More importantly, it would appear that the Bank of England, Central Bank, knew as early as 2008, has not reacted, or has covered, or even may have been complicit in banks. Therefore, the terrible question appears: "who rely?".
The national register of trusts has finally become a reality thanks to a decree published on March 2, 2010. It only use will be to inform various government administrations, in order to reinforce the tools available for fighting tax evasion, money laundering, and terrorism financing.
This collective work describes the contours of French, European, and International healthcare regulation, and explores past, present, and future evolutions and tendencies in this sector. Original French title: Annales de la régulation, 2009, volume 2, sous la direction de Thierry Revet et Laurent Vidal, collection Bibliothèque de l'Institut de Recherche Juridique de la Sorbonne (IRJS) – André Tunc. (LGDJ)
In France, doyen Ripert, who wrote the most eminent treatises on both Civil Law and Corporate Law, possessed a genius that led him to be the first law scholar to study the relationship between Corporate Law and the economic organization of capitalism. In this fundamental work, he highlighted the benefits of the Société Anonyme: it’s majority rule is a tribute to efficiency, and its limitation of shareholders’ liability to the amount of their capital invested produces an incentive to invest. Ripert thereby studied law from an outsider’s perspective. Nobody has ever denied the relationship between the economic structure of the corporation and the legal structure of the corporation, just as no jurist has ever denied the link between the commercial transaction and the contract. Precisely, Ripert gave a sort of evaluation, a way of understanding law from the outside, instead of discussing law from the inside by substituting what the law is for what one wishes it would be. Economics were external to Law, Law adapted itself to Economics, and Economics were not at the heart of Law.
FRENCH
Le droit des sociétés, lorsqu’il est vu par le prisme de la Régulation : Industrie des services financiers et protection du marché de l’investissement
En France, le doyen Ripert qui écrivit tout à la fois les plus grands traités de droit civil et de droit commercial a eu l’ingéniosité d’être le premier juriste à étudier le rapport entre le droit des sociétés et l’organisation économique du capitalisme. Dans cet ouvrage fondamental, il soulignait les bienfaits de la société anonyme, par le tribut que la loi de la majorité rend à l'efficacité et par l'incitation à investir produite par la limitation de responsabilité des actionnaires à hauteur de leur apport. Il s'agissait de parler à propos du droit, dans une perspective extérieure à celui-ci. Nul n'a jamais ignoré les rapports entre la structure économique de l'entreprise et la société commerciale, de la même façon qu'aucun juriste n'a dénié le rapport entre l'échange marchand et le contrat. Mais précisément, il s'agissait d'un rapport, une façon de parler du droit en se situant en dehors de celui-ci, et non pas d'une intimité ou d'une substituabilité entre le droit et ce qui est attendu de lui. L'économie était vue comme extérieure, le droit se mettait en rapport avec elle, l’économie n'était pas au cœur du droit.
GERMAN
Artikel: Körperschaftsrecht durch das Prisma der Verordnung gesehen: der Finanzdienstleistungssektor und der Investorenschutz
In Frankreich war Doyen Ripert, der bedeutende Abhandlungen sowohl über Zivil- und als auch über Körperschaftsrecht schrieb, der erste Jurist, der das Verhältnis zwischen Körperschaftsrecht und der wirtschaftlichen Organisation des Kapitalismus untersuchte. In dieser entscheidenden Arbeit betonte er die Vorteile der Aktiengesellschaft (AG): Mehrheitsentscheidung führt zu maximaler Effizienz und Investitionen werden gefördert durch die Beschränkung der Haftung der Aktionäre. Ripert studierte Rechtswissenschaften somit aus der Perspektive eines Außenstehenden. Niemand hat zwar das Verhältnis zwischen der ökonomischen Struktur eines Unternehmens und seiner rechtlichen Struktur angezweifelt, ebenso wie kein Jurist die Verbindung zwischen dem Handelsgeschäft und dem Vertragsrecht leugnen würde. Jedoch gab Ripert eine Art von Evaluierung, eine Analyse des Rechts in der Perspektive eines Außenstehenden, anstatt von einem Insider-Standpunkt zu philosophieren was das Gesetz sagt und was es sagen sollte. Ökonomie und Recht waren zwei getrennte Disziplinen: das Recht musste sich zwar der Wirtschaft anpassen, jedoch befanden sich wirtschaftliche Beweggründe nicht im Zentrum der Rechtswissenschaft.
POLISH
Artykuł: Prawo o spółkach widziane z punktu widzenia Regulacji: Sektor usług finansowych i ochrona rynku inwesticji.
We Francji, Dziekan Ripert, który napisał najbardziej znane traktaty z prawa cywilnego i prawa handlowego, był jednocześnie pierwszym prawnikiem, który studiował relację istniejącą pomiędzy prawem o spółkach a ekonomiczną organizacją kapitalizmu. W swoim głównym traktacie, podkreślał korzystne strony francuskiej formy spółki z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością (Société Anonyme) : Obowiązująca reguła większości nadaje skuteczności w działaniu, a ograniczenie odpowiedzialności wspólników w stosunku do zainwestowanego kapitału, zachęca do inwestowania. Riper analizował prawo w kontekscie innym niż kontekst prawny. Nikt nigdy nie zaprzeczał istnienia relacji pomiędzy strukturą ekonomiczną firmy i spółką handlową. Tak samo jak żaden prawnik nie negował związku istniejącego pomiędzy wymianą handlową i umową.
Ale to właśnie Ripert, zaproponował po raz pierwszy analizę prawa, wychodzac poza jego kontekst prawny, zamiast oceniać prawo z wewnętrznego, prawnego punktu widzenia lub próbować substytuowac prawo na takie jakie chciałoby się żeby było.
Ekonomia była zawsze traktowana odzielnie od prawa. Prawo dostosowywało się do ekonomii, a ekonomia nie była w centrum prawa.
SPANISH
El derecho corporativo visto a través de la prisma de la regulación: la industria de los Servicios financieros y la protección al inversor.
En Francia, el decano Ripert, quien escribió uno de los tratados más inminentes sobre el Derecho civil y el Derecho corporativo, poseía un genio que lo convirtió en el primer erudito en estudiar la relación entre el Derecho corporativo y la organización económica del capitalismo. En su obra fundamental, subraya los beneficios de la Sociedad Anónima: su regla de la mayoría es tributo a la eficiencia y la limitación que pone sobre los pasivos de los accionistas en cuanto al acceso al capital que han invertido se convierte en un incentivo más para invertir. Ripert ha logrado, por consiguiente, estudiar el derecho de una perspectiva ajena. Nadie ha negado nunca la relación entre la estructura económica de la corporación y la estructura legal de la corporación, tal como ningún jurista no ha negado nunca el lazo entre la transacción comercial y el contrato. Precisamente, Ripert da una clase de evaluación, una manera de comprender el derecho desde afuera, en vez de discutirlo desde adentro al substituir lo que el derecho es en la realidad y lo que desearíamos que el derecho fuera. La Economía se encontraba fuera de la esfera del Derecho, pero el Derecho se ha adaptado a la Economía, y la Economía no se encontraba en el núcleo del Derecho.
The September 8th 2010 decision of the European Court of Justice rules that any national law on gambling restraining freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, if not consistent and systemic in its purpose, violates EU Law.
SPANISH
La Corte Europea de Justicia restringe a los Estados Miembros la habilidad de dificultar la libre provisión y establecimiento de servicios de juego en su territorio nacional.
El 8 de septiembre del 2010, una decisión de la Corte Europea de Justicio juzga que cualquier ley nacional sobre los juegos que restrinjan la libertad de establecimiento y la liberad de proveer servicios, a menos de que sea consistente y sistémica en su propósito, viola la Ley de la Unión Europea.
ITALIAN
Relazione tematica (scommesse): La Corte di giustizia europea riduce la possibilità per gli Stati membri di ostacolare la libera circolazione ed il libero stabilimento dei servizi di scommesse sul proprio territorio.
La Corte di giustizia, con una sentenza dell’8 settembre 2010, ha deciso che ogni legislazione nazionale in materia di scommesse che riduce il diritto di libero stabilimento e la libera prestazione di servizi viola il diritto europeo, qualora tale legislazione non contribuisca a limitare l’attività di scommesse in maniera coerente e sistematica.
The colloquium will take place, a priori, on site in Toulouse, on October 14, 2021.
It will be broadcasted in live online.
🎥 Videos will be extracted.
► Presentation of the topic :
Compliance Law tends towards "Monumental Goals". This puts the concern, the calculation and the control of proportionality at the center. Proportionality is one of the most common references for compliance practices and strategies, but paradoxically, one of the least well defined. Perhaps even one of the most elusive.
For the German Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe, the principle of proportionality allows the quantitative easing policies of the European Central Bank (ECB) to be monitored. This principle is linked to nothing less than the principle of democracy and is the basis of the control of ultra vires. In French law, proportionality refers to the provisions of Article 8 of the Déclaration des droits (Bill of Rights) of 1789, according to which the law should only establish penalties that are strictly and obviously necessary. In many areas of civil or business life, the compliance of behavior and the consequences of non-compliance are assessed on the basis of a graded assessment by the censor (competitor, regulator or judge).
Proportionality calls for action, which opens up a margin of appreciation to take into account the facts or circumstances. It also allows for the exercise of control over abuse of rights or excess of power. It goes beyond the office of the judge or the censor to forge one of its tools: the control of proportionality, which is obviously not the proportionality of the control.
How to integrate proportionality into compliance practices and strategies?
Does it introduce a certain tolerance in the assessment of situations and is it thus a factor of rediscovered freedom in the development of risk matrices?
Conversely, is it not synonymous with increased vigilance on the part of compliance officers, by leaving open the possibility of a reinforced control of their acts or decisions, by the evaluation of their advisability and not of their conformity alone?
► Working method:
🚧 The colloquium is built around 4 topics, which would be prepared in 4 working papers.
🚧 The writing of each working paper will have been entrusted by experts.
Secondly, these working papers will be available to be criticized by two practionners of Compliance technics.
For each topic, there will be these three sequences:
Presentation of the topic by the author of the working paper ;
Discussion by the two discussants, who will have read the working paper previously ;
Discussion with the public onsite and online.
The four topics chosen are:
1️⃣ Proportionality and Conformity
2️⃣ Proportionality and Evaluation
3️⃣ Proportionality and Normativity
4️⃣ Proportionality and Sanction
► registrations and information :
attendance to the manifestation is free, onsite or online
every registration for an attendance onsite will be supported by Toulouse-I-Capitole University
information will be available on a website opened by Toulouse-I-Capitole University
____
►Will speak, notably :
🎤 Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, professor of Regulation and Compliance Law, director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance
🎤 Alexandra Mendoza-Carminade, professor at Toulouse-I-Capitole University
🎤Lucien Rapp, professor at Toulouse-I-Capitole University
🎤 Marc Segonds, professor at Toulouse-I-Capitole University
Each year, the Autorité des marchés financiers (French financial markets regulator), the European Central Bank and the Agence française anti-corruption (French anti-corruption agency) publish risk maps. At first glance, risk maps established by the regulator aim to both help regulator and the regulated company to face risks by anticipating them. These documents would only be an assistance brought to firms in their Compliance mission and not an injunction from the regulator to take into account the risks that it emphasizes.
However, Law forces firms to do their own risk maps under penalty of sanctions. Since the regulator has previously published its own risk map, can companies, obliged to write theirs, deviate from it? If the firm follows the map published by the regulator, can it protect itself against this if it is accused of not having fulfilled its compliance obligations? On the contrary, if the operator does not follow regulator's risk map, can this be blamed on it? Formally, regulator's risk maps do not come with an injunction to take it into account but, as everyone knows, any recommendation from a regulator or supervisor must be taken into account.
The legal solution could here be the implementation of a system of "comply or explain" which would mean that if the firm decides to no follow the risk map established by the regulator, it must be able to justify its choice.
The Nigerien Minister for Communication, New Technologies, Information, and Culture, Mrs. Takoubakoye Amina Boureima, announced at the 3rd African Telecommunications Union plenipotentiary conference in Brazzaville, on September 26, 2010, that her country would implement a system for the regulation of international telecommunications similar to the Congolese system.
FRENCH
Fiche Thématique (Télécommunications): la Républque du Niger a annoncé la mise en place d'un système de régulation des télécommunications en suivant le modèle mis en place par la République Démocratique du Congo.
Le ministre de la Communication, des Nouvelles Technologies, de l'Information et de la Culture du Niger, Mme Takoubakoye Amina Boureima, a annoncé, au cours de la 3e conférence plénipotentiaire des télécommunications de l'Union Africaine à Brazzaville, le 26 septembre 2010, que son pays allait mettre en place un système de régulation des communications internationales similaire à celui du Congo.
GERMAN
Thematischer Bericht (Telekom): die Republik Niger wird ein Regulierungssystem für Telekommunikation in Anlehnung am kongolesischen Modell einführen.
Die Ministerin für Kommunikation, Neue Technologien, Information und Kultur der Republik Niger, Frau Takoubakoye Amina Boureima, hat am 26. September 2010, im Lauf der 3. Telekomkonferenz der Afrikanischen Union in Brazzaville, den Wille ihrer Land verkündigt, ein Regulierungssystem für Telekommunikation in Anlehnung am kongolesischen Modell einzuführen.
SPANISH
La República de Níger ha anunciado que implementará sistemas regulatorias de telecomunicaciones siguiendo el modelo establecido por la República del Congo.
El Ministro Nigerino de Comunicación, Nuevas Tecnologías, Información y Cultura, la Señora Amina Boureima, anunció en el 3er conferencia plenipotenciaria de la Unión africana de telecomunicaciones en Brazzaville el 26 de septiembre el 2010, que su país implementaría un sistema para la regulación de telecomunicaciones internacionales similar al que se encuentra en el sistema congolesa.
forthcoming in the series Regulations & Compliance, co-published by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) with Dalloz.