May 17, 2021

Events : JoRC

📅 Cycle of colloquia 2021 around Compliance monumental goals

📅 Public norms and Compliance in time of crisis : monumental goals put to a test (Normes publiques et Compliance en temps de crise : les buts monumentaux à l’épreuve)

ComplianceTech® ↗️pour lire cette fiche en français, veuillez cliquer sur le drapeau français

This scientific manifestation is placed under the scientific direction of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, Pascale Idoux, Antoine Oumedjkane and Adrien Tehrani. It is organized by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and by the Faculté de Droit et de Science Politique de l'Université de Montpellier (Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes Administratives de Montpellier and Centre du Droit de l'Entreprise).

📅 This manifestation is part of the cycle of colloquia organized in 2021 around the general topic of Compliance Monumental Goals. 

 

 

 

The interventions will give rise to the production of articles which will be part of

 📕  Les bus monumentaux de la Compliance📚   to be published in the Series Regulations & Compliance , co-published par the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Dalloz.

📘Compliance Monumental Goals, 📚   dans la Série Compliance & Regulation , co-published by par le Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC) and Bruylant.

 

This manifestation took place on Zoom on 17th of May 2021. 

Registrations: anouk.leguillou@mafr.fr 

Assistance to this event may be validated as part of the continuing education of lawyers.

In addition, scientific videos will be extracted and disseminated later.

 

Presentation of the topic: In the overall problematic of "Monumental goals", this conference retains a particular case: that of the crisis and the emergency situation that it generates.

First of all, in general, does the importance of public norms in the emergency context engendered by a crisis situation imply a marginalization of Compliance? Don't private actors also have their place in these circumstances, at the service of the "monumental goals" that the public authorities want to maintain, or even which appear specifically?

Secondly, more concretely, we have been living for many months in a health crisis. By taking it as a framework and, within it from particular cases, how public and private actors react, act, adjust? and how do the courts assess these movements?

Going from the most general to the most specific, this conference aims to identify criteria, limits, of what could be specific rules when the emergency of a crisis meets Compliance, and will examine specific situations.

 

Working method: The conference is therefore built on a general issue, which was the subject of a "working paper", written by Antoine Oumedjkane, Adrien Tehrani and Pascale Idoux, on which the speakers will have thought in advance and from which they are intended to study the question from their particular perspective.

The conference, which is essentially interactive, therefore begins with an outline of the main lines of this general work. It is followed by the examination of concrete practical cases.

They are as follows:

1️⃣ hydro-alcoholic gel, its manufacture, price, availability,

2️⃣ information and regulation on all media in Covid period

3️⃣ the use of the bicycle during the state of health emergency

A first conclusion, thematically limited, will relate to Revealed by the crisis situation, the place of private initiative in Compliance Law.

A second, more general, undoubtedly open-ended conclusion is drawn from this confrontation between general reflection and concrete cases which must be resolved in a particular crisis.

 

speakers: 

🎤 Jean-Bernard Auby, Emeritus Professor of Sciences po (Paris)

🎤 Julien Bonnet, Professor at Montpellier University and member of the CERCOP

🎤 Guylain Clamour, Dean of Montpellier Law School

🎤 Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, agrégée des Facultés de droit, Professor of Regulation and Compliance Law at Sciences Po (Paris) and Director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC)

🎤 Pascale Idoux, Professor at Montpellier University 

🎤 Pascale Léglise, adjointe au directeur des libertés publiques et des affaires juridiques (Deputy Director of Civil Liberties and Legal Affairs) of the Ministère de l'intérieur (Home Ministry)

🎤 Michèle Léridon, Member of the Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (French Media Regulator), President of the working group Pluralisme, déontologie, supervision des plateformes en ligne (Pluralism, Deontology, Supervision of Online Platforms)

🎤 Antoine Oumedjkane, Researcher of the Centre de recherche et d'études administratives (Research and Administrative Studies Center) of Montpellier University

🎤 Nelly Sudres, Maître de conférences at Montpellier University and member of the Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes Administratives (Research and Administrative Studies Center) of Montpellier University

🎤 Adrien Tehrani, Professor at Montpellier University and member of the Centre du Droit de l'Entreprise (Company Law Center)

🎤Xavier Vallad, Group Legal Director, Intermarché

 

⤵️Read a more detailed presentation of the manifestation below:

PUBLIC NORMS AND COMPLIANCE IN TIME OF CRISIS : 

MONUMENTAL GOALS PUT TO THE TEST

17th of May 2021, from 2pm to 6.30pm

Live Broadcasting on Zoom

Coorganized by the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC), the Centre de Recherche et d'Etudes Administratives of Montpellier University and the Centre de Droit de l'Entreprise of Montpellier University Law School

under the scientific direction of Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, Pascale Idoux, Antoine Oumedjkane et Adrien Tehrani.

 

2pm. Welcome words by Guylain Clamour, Dean of Montpellier Law School

2.05pm. Introductive words by Pascale Idoux, Professor at Montpellier University

 

I. THE SHOCK BETWEEN PUBLIC NORMS AND COMPLIANCE IN TIME OF CRISIS

2.15pm. Presentation of the general hypothesis of the article elaborated for the colloquium by Adrien Tehrani, Professor at Montpellier University and member of the Centre du Droit de l'Entreprise (Company Law Center) and Antoine Oumedjkane, Researcher of the Centre de recherche et d'études administratives (Research and Administrative Studies Center) of Montpellier University

 

II. CASE-BY-CASE TESTS OF THE SHOCK BETWEEN PUBLIC NORMS AND COMPLIANCE IN TIME OF CRISIS

3pm. The test of hydroalcoholic gel

  • Intervention of Nelly Sudres, maître de conférences at Montpellier University and member of the Centre de Recherches et d'Etudes Administratives (Research and Administrative Studies Center) of Montpellier University
  • Intervention of Xavier Vallad, Legal Director of Intermarché
  • Discussion

3.45pm. The test of health information in the course of a health crisis

  • Introduction of Pascal Idoux, Professor at Montpellier University
  • Intervention of Michèle Léridon, Member of the CSA
  • Discussion

4.30pm. The test of the bicycle 

  • Intervention of Julien Bonnet, Professor at Montpellier University and member of the CERCOP
  • Intervention of Pascale Léglise, adjointe au directeur des libertés publiques et des affaires juridiques (Deputy Director of Civil Liberties and Legal Affairs) of the Ministère de l'intérieur (Home Ministry)
  • Discussion

 

5.15pm : General discussion around the three examinated cases

 

III. GENERAL THINKINGS ON THE SHOCK BETWEEN PUBLIC NORMES AND COMPLIANCE IN TIME OF CRISIS 

5.30pm. The place of entrepreneurs in the creation and effectiveness of Compliance Law in the event of a crisis, by Marie-Anne Frison-Roche, agrégée des Facultés de droit, Professor of Regulation and Compliance Law at Sciences Po (Paris) and Director of the Journal of Regulation & Compliance (JoRC)

6pm. General conclusions, by Jean-Bernard Auby, Emeritus Professor of Sciences Po (Paris)

 

6.30pm. End of works. 

 

______

comments are disabled for this article