Search results (751 cards)

Updated: Dec. 19, 2011 (Initial publication: Dec. 19, 2011)

Doctrine

Articulation ou désarticulation des régulations nationales et internationales

Articulation ou désarticulation des régulation nationales et internationales

Updated: Nov. 4, 2010 (Initial publication: Oct. 12, 2010)

Sectorial Analysis

II-8.1 : The European Court of Justice restricts Member States' ability to hinder the free provision and establishment of gambling services on their national territory.

  

ENGLISH

The September 8th 2010 decision of the European Court of Justice rules that any national law on gambling restraining freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services, if not consistent and systemic in its purpose, violates EU Law.


SPANISH

La Corte Europea de Justicia restringe a los Estados Miembros la habilidad de dificultar la libre provisión y establecimiento de servicios de juego en su territorio nacional.

El 8 de septiembre del 2010, una decisión de la Corte Europea de Justicio juzga que cualquier ley nacional sobre los juegos que restrinjan la libertad de establecimiento y la liberad de proveer servicios, a menos de que sea consistente y sistémica en su propósito, viola la Ley de la Unión Europea.

     

 

ITALIAN

 Relazione tematica (scommesse): La Corte di giustizia europea riduce la possibilità per gli Stati membri di ostacolare la libera circolazione ed il libero stabilimento dei servizi di scommesse sul proprio territorio.

La Corte di giustizia, con una sentenza dell’8 settembre 2010, ha deciso che ogni legislazione nazionale in materia di scommesse che riduce il diritto di libero stabilimento e la libera prestazione di servizi viola il diritto europeo, qualora tale legislazione non contribuisca a limitare l’attività di scommesse in maniera coerente e sistematica.


     


  

Updated: Oct. 7, 2011 (Initial publication: March 9, 2011)

Authors

HERRENSCHMIDT, Fleur

Fleur Herrenschmidt is Counsel in the EU Competition department at Allen & Overy Paris. She has a post graduate degree in European Law (College of Europe) and in European Legal Studies (University of Paris X) and an LL.M. from the London School of Economics. (...)

Updated: Jan. 23, 2012 (Initial publication: Dec. 5, 2011)

Doctrine

Political and Cultural Conditions for the Increased Independence of the Supervisory Agencies in Norway

Political and Cultural Conditions for the Increased Independence of the Supervisory Agencies in Norway

Updated: Feb. 3, 2012 (Initial publication: Dec. 7, 2011)

Doctrine

Vers un droit postmoderne

Vers un droit postmoderne

Updated: Dec. 20, 2011 (Initial publication: Dec. 20, 2011)

Doctrine

Régulation et hiérarchie des normes

Régulation et hiérarchie des normes

Updated: Dec. 20, 2011 (Initial publication: Dec. 20, 2011)

Doctrine

État, juge et régulateur

État, juge et régulateur

Updated: Dec. 19, 2011 (Initial publication: Dec. 19, 2011)

Doctrine

Régulation et théorie général du procès

Régulation et théorie général du procès

Updated: Dec. 14, 2011 (Initial publication: Dec. 14, 2011)

Doctrine

Montée en puissance passée et impasses actuelles de la régulation économique européennes des industries de réseau.

Montée en puissance passée et impasses actuelles de la régulation économique européennes des industries de réseau.

Updated: June 22, 2010 (Initial publication: June 1, 2010)

Symposiums

III-3.6: The « Autorité de régulation des communications électroniques et des Postes - ARCEP" (the French telecommunications and postal regulator) organized a colloquium on April 13, 2010, on « La neutralité des réseaux » (Network Neutrality).

The Autorité de la régulation des communications électroniques et des postes - ARCEP (French Telecommunications and Posts Regulator) organized the Colloquium on "la neutralité des réseaux" The Network Neutrality), which took place on April 13, 2010. Each actor uses the generality of the term ‘neutrality’ in an interpretation that best suits his opinions. However, neutrality means that there should be no discrimination between Internet users; however, it does not mean that they have the right to everything for free: because there has to be some sort of traffic and bandwidth management, consumer and copyright protection, it is necessary to strike a balance between these contradictory rights in order to allow the network to develop. Therefore, a regulator is necessary. The future development of the Internet depends upon it. For the moment, nobody knows who these legitimate regulators are, and how they would be able to regulate these competing forces, organize information transparency, and encourage long-term investment, while preserving competition at the same time.
Copyright © 2010-2023 -
Legals