The recent news

Updated: April 13, 2010 (Initial publication: April 10, 2010)

Contributions

Sectorial Report (Media, Internet): Decision of the Federal Appeals Court in Washington, D.C. handed down on 6 April 2010: Comcast Corporation vs. Federal Communication Commission (FCC). This Regulator is incompetent to impose the theory of Network and Internet Neutrality.

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: Feb. 25, 2010)

Contributions

Article : Regulating the gambling Market : Quality-based versus price-based competition

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: April 8, 2010)

Contributions

Bibliographical Report (Book): Annales de la régulation (Annals of Regulation), 2009, Volume 2, directed by Thierry Revet and Laurent Vidal

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: April 7, 2010)

Contributions

Sectorial Record (Bank, Finance): The Ministerial Order of 19 January 2010 modifies the Banque de France’s Comité de la réglementation bancaire (Banking and Financial Regulatory Committee) Regulation n° 97-02 of 21 February 1997 relating to the internal control of banks and investment firms.

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: April 3, 2010)

Contributions

Sectorial Record (Finance): The French Court of Cassation handed down a decision on 23 September 2009 concerning a Right of First Refusal clause in which the price of resale is predetermined

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: April 8, 2010)

Bibliographic Reports : Books

III-1.3 : Annales de la régulation (Annals of Regulation), 2009, Volume 2, Directed by Thierry Revet and Laurent Vidal

This collective work describes the contours of French, European, and International healthcare regulation, and explores past, present, and future evolutions and tendencies in this sector. Original French title: Annales de la régulation, 2009, volume 2, sous la direction de Thierry Revet et Laurent Vidal, collection Bibliothèque de l'Institut de Recherche Juridique de la Sorbonne (IRJS) – André Tunc. (LGDJ)

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: April 6, 2010)

Sectorial Analysis

II-9.1 : A United States Federal Court found that payments made by Schering Plough in order to delay the introduction of generic forms of its drugs did not violate Antitrust Law, in a 26 March 2010 decision.

Main information

The U.S. District Court in Newark, New Jersey, dismissed a class action suit brought against drug manufacturer, Schering Plough, alleging that payments it made to two generic drug manufacturers in order to delay the introduction of generic forms of one of its products, violated antitrust law.

Updated: April 12, 2010 (Initial publication: April 6, 2010)

Contributions

Sectorial report (Health) : A United States Federal Court found that payments made by Schering Plough in order to delay the introduction of generic forms of its drugs did not violate Antitrust Law, in a 26 March 2010 decision.

Copyright © 2010-2023 -
Legals